Johnson v. Siemens Industry Inc.
Plaintiff: David A. Johnson
Defendant: Siemens Industry Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv00880
Filed: November 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael R Barrett
Referring Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2022 Filing 19 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Siemens Industry Inc.. (bjc)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 CLERK'S JUDGMENT filed concurrently with #17 Order signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/16/2021. (kkz)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #16 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/16/2021. (kkz)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/01/2021. Objections due by 12/15/2021 (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified to Add Objections Deadline to Text on 12/2/2021 (bjc).
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/9/2021. Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order why this case should not be DISMISSED, with prejudice, for want of prosecution, failure to participate in the Rule 26(f) discovery report of the parties, and failure to attend the preliminary scheduling conference. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 8, 2021 Minute Entry: Case called this date before Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz for a Scheduling Conference held via telephone on 11/8/2021. Counsel for defendant present. Pro-se plaintiff not present. Matters discussed. Order of the Court to follow. (Court Reporter: None present) (art)
October 13, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of SCHEDULING/STATUS CONFERENCE: Scheduling/Status Conference set for 11/8/2021 04:00 PM. Parties are to call into the conference line five minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/13/2021. (kl)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 12, 2021 Filing 13 RULE 26(f) REPORT (Non-Joint, Plaintiff Would Not Participate) by Defendant Siemens Industry Inc.. (McIntyre, M)
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 08/25/2021. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 10, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by Siemens Industry Inc.. (McIntyre, M)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and including September 10, 2021 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/13/2021. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (Main Document 10 replaced on 8/17/2021) (kh).
August 12, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by M Scott McIntyre for Defendant Siemens Industry Inc. (McIntyre, M)
August 12, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Complaint New date requested 9/10/2021. by Defendant Siemens Industry Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (McIntyre, M)
August 9, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed (Not Effectuated related to COVID19) as to Defendant Siemens Industry Inc.. Siemens Industry Inc. served on 7/9/2021, answer due 7/30/2021. (kh)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - It is ORDERED that the United States Marshal re-serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis upon the defendant as directed by the plaintiff. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 06/03/2021. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 3, 2021 Documents provided for service to the U.S. Marshals per Doc. #6 This Date. (bjc)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: It is ORDERED that the United States Marshal re-serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis upon the defendant as directed by the plaintiff. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/12/2021. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 4, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Siemens Industry Inc. and sent to the U.S. Marshals for service along with a copy of the complaint, the order granting IFP and issuing service, and USM-285 Forms. (bjc)
November 4, 2020 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Siemens Industry Inc., filed by David A. Johnson. (bjc)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/04/2020. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 2, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff David A. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for Damages, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form, #4 Form USM-285) (kh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Siemens Industry Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David A. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Siemens Industry Inc.
Represented By: M Scott McIntyre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?