Johnson v. Osborne et al
| Michael L. Johnson |
| Jane Doe, Koch Edwin, Sergeant Barney Brian, Lieutenant Rodney Osborne and Brain Sparks |
| 1:2021cv00003 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 1:21-cv-141 and 1:21-cv-3 are related, the subject case nevertheless will remain with the Judge to who it was assigned. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 03/04/2021. (bjc)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 1:20-cv-157 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Matthew W. McFarland for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 01/08/2021. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified Name of Judge Who Signed the Order on 1/8/2021 (bjc).
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Michael L. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Envelope) (bjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
