Stires v. Commissioner of Social Security
| David Edward Stires |
| Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv00025 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Susan J Dlott |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 425 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 5/14/2021. by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Lewis, Ameenah)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 02/04/2021. (bjc)
|
|
Filing 5
JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Lewis, Ameenah)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Ameenah Lewis for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Lewis, Ameenah)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE by Plaintiff David Edward Stires Civil Cover Sheet (Cade, Howard)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 3/15/2021. (kh)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-7978305), filed by David Edward Stires. (Cade, Howard)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
