Buck v. The Kroger Company
| Alexander Buck |
| The Kroger Company |
| 1:2021cv00279 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTATION ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of William B. Federman as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/14/2021. (eh)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8358539) of William B. Federman by Plaintiff Alexander Buck. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (Coates, Terence) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Interim Class Counsel by Plaintiff Alexander Buck. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Appoint Interim Class Counsel, #2 Coates Declaration in Support of Motion to Appoint Interim Class Counsel, #3 Proposed Order on Motion to Appoint Interim Class Counsel) (Coates, Terence) |
|
Filing 8
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland and Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/20/2021. The Judges agree that this case and case numbers 1:21-cv-146; 1:21-cv-174; 1:21-cv-198; 1:21-cv-226; 1:21-cv-240; 1:21-cv-279 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Timothy S. Black for all further proceedings. (kl)
|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. (Flick, Brian) |
| Filing 6 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that case numbers 1:21-cv-279, 1:21-cv-146, 1:21-cv-174, 1:21-cv-198, 1:21-cv-226 and 1:21-cv-240 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Timothy S. Black for all further proceedings. (kh) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Plaintiff Alexander Buck. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Coates, Terence) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Terence Richard Coates for Plaintiff Alexander Buck (Coates, Terence) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to The Kroger Company on 4/20/2021, answer due 6/21/2021. (Flick, Brian) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against The Kroger Company ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8271814), filed by Alexander Buck. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Flick, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buck v. The Kroger Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Kroger Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexander Buck | |
| Represented By: | Brian Flick |
| Represented By: | Terence Richard Coates |
| Represented By: | William B Federman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
