Muniz-Badra v. Vinyl and Carpet Services, Inc
| Pedro Muniz-Badra |
| Vinyl and Carpet Services Inc |
| 1:2021cv00283 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| Susan J Dlott |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants motion to Remand #5 be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 6/16/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/2/2021. (art) |
Filing 6
ORDER - this case is hereby ORDERED referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz to rule on all motions except summary judgment motions. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 04/21/2021. (bjc)
|
| Filing 5 Motion to Remand Case to State Court by Defendant Vinyl and Carpet Services Inc re #1 Notice of Removal, TO REMAND BACK TO STATE COURT (Vollmar, Andy) Modified event type from Notice to Motion and modified docket text to reflect document caption on 4/21/2021 (kl). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Defendants residence for venue purposes is in Hamilton County, where its principal place of business is located. See S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 82.1(d). Hamilton County is within the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Cincinnati. See S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 82.1(b).This case is therefore TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division in Cincinnati. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 4/20/21. (pb)
|
| Case transferred in from USDC at Dayton Division on 04/20/2021 Case Number 3:21-cv-119. Case assigned to Judge Susan J. Dlott and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (pb) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Vinyl and Carpet Services Inc. (Originally filed with the Notice of Removal #1 (jmb) |
| Filing 2 (Copy of) COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Vinyl and Carpet Services Inc., filed by Pedro Muniz-Badra. (Originally filed in the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County on 3/15/2021 - Case No. 2021 CV 01031) (jmb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, case number 2021 CV 01031 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8265414), filed by VINYL & CARPET SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit) (Vollmar, Andy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Muniz-Badra v. Vinyl and Carpet Services, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pedro Muniz-Badra | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Joseph Intili |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vinyl and Carpet Services Inc | |
| Represented By: | Andy T. Vollmar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
