Randall v. Duke Energy, et al
| Ashley Randall |
| Online Information Services Inc and Duke Energy |
| 1:2021cv00288 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED: (1) That Plaintiff's response to the show cause order #7 be construed as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this case under Rule 41(a)(2) and be GRANTED, with this case to be dismissed without prejudice; (2) That Defendant Duke Energy's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction #4 be DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due by 7/1/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 6/17/2021. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
NOTATION ORDER re #7 Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause. The attachments provided with Plaintiff's response contain personal identifiers, to include Plaintiff's date of birth and social security number. In order to protect Plaintiff from the public possibly viewing this information on the Court's public docket, the Court hereby ORDERS that these attachments be placed under seal until further Order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 6/1/2021. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO #6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Plaintiff Ashley Randall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (bjc) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing on or before 6/17/2021, why Defendant Duke Energy's motion to dismiss #4 should not be construed as unopposed and granted for the reasons stated. Plaintiff may also satisfy the requirements of this Order by filing a responsive memorandum to Defendants motion by the 6/17/2021 deadline. Failure to timely comply with this Order will result in a Report and Recommendation to the District Judge that the pending motion be granted. Show Cause Response due by 6/17/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/24/2021. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by Online Information Services Inc. (Vaisa, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss originally filed 4/13/2021 in Hamilton County Municipal Court (Case No. 21CV05476) by Defendant Duke Energy. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (kl) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT originally filed 3/15/2021 in Hamilton County Municipal Court (Case No. 21CV05476) by Ashley Randall. (kl) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Defendants Duke Energy, Online Information Services Inc re #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheets (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Vaisa, Jeffrey) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Municipal Court, case number 21CV05476 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8276575), filed by Online Information Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Pleadings, and Orders served to date upon the Defendants in the State Court Action, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Compliance) (Vaisa, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
