Bhamidipati v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
| Madhavi Bhamidipati |
| Prudential Insurance Company of America and Cintas Corporation Long Term Disability Plan |
| 1:2021cv00485 |
| July 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Susan J Dlott |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Cintas Corporation Long-Term Disability Plan ONLY without Prejudice by Plaintiff Madhavi Bhamidipati. (McDonald, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Prudential Insurance Company of America on 7/21/2021, answer due 9/20/2021. (McDonald, Joseph) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 07/23/2021. (bjc)
|
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cintas Corporation Long Term Disability Plan, Prudential Insurance Company of America ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8412237), filed by Madhavi Bhamidipati. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - January 29, 2020 letter from Prudential, #2 Exhibit B - February 6, 2020 letter to Prudential from Plaintiff, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (McDonald, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
