Sherman v. Experian et al
| Sharnee Sherman |
| Experian, Equifax and TransUnion |
| 1:2021cv00486 |
| July 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that plaintiff show cause in writing, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, why the Court should not dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/14/2021. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz In accordance with General Order CIN 14-01. Motions referred to Karen L. Litkovitz. (bjc)
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Equifax, Equifax Inc identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc for Equifax.. (Wallace, David)
|
|
Filing 9
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Experian, Experian plc, Central Source LLC, Online Data Exchange LLC, New Management Services LLC, VantageScore Solutions LLC, Opt-Out Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian.. (Rector, Emily)
|
|
Filing 8
Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services LLC's Memorandum of Law in Support of their #7 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint or for a More Definite Statement. Filed by Experian. (Rector, Emily) Modified docket text and to add relationship on 7/29/2021 (kl).
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM OR FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT by Defendants Experian and Equifax. (Rector, Emily) Modified to include additional filer on 7/29/2021 (kl). Added MOTION on 7/29/2021 (kl).
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Mae Rector for Defendant Experian (Rector, Emily)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative Defenses filed by TransUnion. (Huse, William)
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT against Equifax, Experian, TransUnion, originally filed in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A2102088) on June 21, 2021, by Sharnee Sherman. (kh)
|
|
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kh)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants TransUnion, TransUnion, TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for TransUnion.. (Huse, William)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by William Madison Huse for Defendant TransUnion (Huse, William)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court Of Common Pleas Hamilton County, OH, case number A 2102088 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8413515), filed by TransUnion. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Summons To Trans Union, LLC, #2 Exhibit B-Complaint To Trans Union, LLC, #3 Exhibit C-Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Consent To Removal, #4 Exhibit D-Equifax Information Services, LLCs Consent To Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Huse, William)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
