Moran v. Ruan Logistics Corp. et al
Andrew Moran |
Ruan Logistics Corp., Ryder Truck Rental, Anthony Alford, O'Neal Steel, LLC and John Does I-III |
1:2021cv00517 |
August 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Timothy S Black |
Douglas R Cole |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Move or Plead by Defendants Anthony Alford, O'Neal Steel, LLC, Ruan Logistics Corp., Ryder Truck Rental. (Cotter, Christopher) |
Reset Deadlines per doc #6 : Anthony Alford answer due 11/1/2021; O'Neal Steel, LLC answer due 11/1/2021; Ruan Logistics Corp. answer due 11/1/2021; Ryder Truck Rental answer due 11/1/2021. (kh) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to All Defendants. (Day, Stephanie) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that case numbers 1:21-cv-517 and 1:18-cv-223 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Timothy S. Black for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/23/2021. (kh) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (kh) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8446916), filed by Andrew Moran. (Day, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.