El-Bey et al v. The United States of America et al
| Jhonali One Eye El-Bey, Moorish American National and Indigenous Tribal Government |
| The United States of America, The State Of Ohio, The Ohio Attorney General, The City of Wilmington, The County of Clinton, The Wilmington Police Department, The Clinton County Municipal Court, The Clinton County Adult Detention Center, Clinton County Sheriff, Office of Secretary of State and Office of the Prosecuting Attorney |
| 1:2021cv00574 |
| September 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 1:21-cv-679 and 1:21-cv-590 ARE related. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 10/29/2021. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE to Proceed Pro Se For Ones Self by Plaintiffs Jhonali One Eye El-Bey, Jttonali One Eye El-Bey, Jhonali One Eye El-Bey (bjc) (Main Document 8 replaced on 10/27/2021) (bjc). |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Plaintiffs Jhonali One Eye El-Bey, Jttonali One Eye El-Bey, Jhonali One Eye El-Bey. (bjc) Document forwarded to chambers of Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 10/26/2021. (kl) |
|
Filing 5
DEFICIENCY ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT plaintiff pay $402 ($350 filing fee plus $52 administrative fee) or submit to the Court a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the preceding six-month period within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 09/30/2021. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Copies of the Complaint and various Summons/USM-285 Forms) by Plaintiff Jhonali One Eye El-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Complaint with Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons and USM-285 Forms) (eh) |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM-IN-OPPOSITION-TO #2 DEFICIENCY ORDER [FORMA PAUPERIS] by Plaintiff Jhonali One Eye El-Bey. (eh) |
|
Filing 2
DEFICIENCY ORDER - plaintiff is ORDERED to file a habeas corpus petition or civil complaint that complies with the standard set forth above within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to pay the applicable filing fee or file a complete application and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis, also within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 09/16/2021. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: JS 44 and copies of the Complaint) by Plaintiffs Jhonali One Eye El-Bey, Indigenous Tribal Government, Moorish American National. (Attachments: #1 Hapeas Corpsus, #2 Exhibits, #3 Civil Cover Sheet and Cover Letter, #4 Summons, #5 Process and Return, #6 Motion/Complaint/Seizure Warrant, #7 Envelope) (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
