Ketring v. City of Loveland, Ohio et al
Kody Austin Ketring |
City of Loveland, Ohio, Dennis Rahe, Kevin Corbett, Kyle Bibelhausen, Anthony Pecord and City of Loveland |
1:2021cv00582 |
September 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Matthew W McFarland |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul G Croushore for Plaintiff Kody Austin Ketring (Croushore, Paul) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT originally filed 8/6/2021 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A2102712) by Kody Austin Ketring. (kl) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kl) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #4 Complaint filed by Kyle Bibelhausen, City of Loveland, Kevin Corbett, Anthony Pecord, Dennis Rahe. (Barbiere, Katherine) Modified to create link on 9/9/2021 (kl). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence Edward Barbiere for Defendants Kyle Bibelhausen, City of Loveland, Ohio, Kevin Corbett, Anthony Pecord, Dennis Rahe (Barbiere, Lawrence) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A2102712 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8487930), filed by Anthony Pecord, Kevin Corbett, Dennis Rahe, City of Loveland, Ohio, Kyle Bibelhausen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court Documents) (Barbiere, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.