Ibrahim v. Schweitzer
Defendant: Tom Schweitzer
Petitioner: Mohamed Ibrahim
Case Number: 1:2021cv00648
Filed: October 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
Referring Judge: Douglas R Cole
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Mohamed Ibrahim (Receipt No. AOHSDC-8535039). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Decision and Entry, #2 Exhibit B: 2014 WL 6725812, #3 Exhibit C: Decision on Post-Trial Motions, #4 Errata D: 2020 WL 3440149, #5 Exhibit E: 160 Ohio St.3d 1421, #6 Exhibit F: Appeal Not Accepted) (Sirkin, Henry) Modified on 10/8/2021 (kh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ibrahim v. Schweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mohamed Ibrahim
Represented By: Henry Louis Sirkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Schweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?