Perdew v. The Mason City School Board
Edward L. Perdew |
Charles Gavin, Connie Yingling, Desiree Batsche, Jonathan Cooper, Matt Steele, Kevin Wise and The Mason City School Board |
1:2021cv00732 |
November 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Matthew W McFarland |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to doc #10 . (kh) |
Filing 13 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE NOTICE: Rule 26(f) Meeting Report due by 2/22/2022. The Court will thereafter, pursuant to Rule 16(b), enter a Calendar Order or will set and hold a Scheduling Conference after which a Calendar Order will be issued. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint filed by The Mason City School Board. (Keeton, Anne) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Clerk re Doc. #10 to The Mason City School District (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt and Envelope) (kl) |
Filing 10 Verification of Complaint by Plaintiff Edward L. Perdew. (kl) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant The Mason City School Board. The Mason City School Board served on 1/7/2022, answer due 1/28/2022. (kl) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Mailing: Certified mailing of Summons and Complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (kh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/4/2022: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (kh). |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to The Mason City School Board. (kh) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against The Mason City School Board, filed by Edward L. Perdew. (kh) |
Deadline reset per 12/20/2021 Notation Order: Defendants' answer or responsive pleading due by January 10, 2022. (kaf) |
NOTATION ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Plead (Doc. #5 ). For good cause shown, this Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall file an answer or responsive pleading on or before January 10, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 12/20/2021. (kaf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 5 First MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 1/10/2022. TO MOVE, ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD by Defendants Desiree Batsche, Jonathan Cooper, Charles Gavin, Matt Steele, Kevin Wise, Connie Yingling. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANTS EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE, ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD) (Keeton, Anne) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants Desiree Batsche, Jonathan Cooper, Charles Gavin, Matt Steele, Connie Yingling. Defendants served on 11/29/2021, answer due 12/20/2021. (kl) |
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 100CIN043172 (kh) Modified filing date on 12/2/2021 (eh). |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing: Certified mailing of Summons and Complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipts) (kh) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Desiree Batsche, Jonathan Cooper, Charles Gavin, Matt Steele, Kevin Wise, Connie Yingling. (kh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Desiree Batsche, Jonathan Cooper, Charles Gavin, Matt Steele, Kevin Wise, Connie Yingling, filed by Edward L. Perdew. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt) (kh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.