Cassidy v. Scioto County Jail et al
| Leo Cassidy |
| Scioto County Jail/Detention Center/Sherriff |
| 1:2021cv00773 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SHOW CAUSE ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that plaintiff show cause, in writing, and within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, why this Court should not dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 01/31/2022. (bjc)
|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned as Not in Jail. Mail sent to Leo Cassidy as to #9 Related Case Memorandum. (kl) |
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Scioto County Jail/Detention Center/Sherriff. (Moser, David) |
|
Filing 9
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 1:21-cv-795 ARE related.. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 01/13/2022. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 8 Memorandum in RESPONSE to Defendant's #2 First MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Leo Cassidy. (kh) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend #3 Complaint by Plaintiff Leo Cassidy. (kh) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Defendant Scioto County Jail/Detention Center/Sherriff. (Moser, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Plaintiff Upon Filing By Defendant(s) of #2 MOTION to Dismiss. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT originally filed 11/8/2021 in Scioto County Court of Common Pleas (Case 21CIH210) by Leo Cassidy against Scioto County Jail/Detention Center/Sherriff. (eh) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendants Scioto County Jail, Scioto County Sheriff. (Moser, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Scioto County Common Pleas, case number 21CIH00210 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8637149), filed by Scioto County Jail. (Attachments: #1 Complaint in State Court, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Moser, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cassidy v. Scioto County Jail et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leo Cassidy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scioto County Jail/Detention Center/Sherriff | |
| Represented By: | David C. Moser |
| Represented By: | Daniel T Downey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
