Wright v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
| Michael Wright |
| Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00776 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Remand to Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. (sct) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Parties' Joint Motion to Remand and remanding this action to the Court of CommonPleas of Hamilton County, Ohio. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 1/4/22. (sct)
|
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Remand by Defendants Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.. (Brenneman, Deborah) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants originally filed 11/18/2021 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. A 2104005, by Michael Wright. (kl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A 2104005 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8639078), filed by Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Ethicon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Brenneman, Deborah) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
