Davis v. Henkel Corporation, et al
Plaintiff: BRAD A DAVIS and Brad A. Davis
Defendant: HENKEL CORPORATION and THRIVING BRANDS LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv00782
Filed: December 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Timothy S Black
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2022 ***Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in District of Connecticut as case 3:22-cv-00196, filed 02/02/2022. (er)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING TRANSFER - the parties request, via stipulation (Doc. #6 ), totransfer this case to the District of Connecticut is GRANTED. This case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, and the Clerk shall act accordingly. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 02/02/2022. (bjc)
February 2, 2022 Case transferred to District of Connecticut. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (bjc)
February 1, 2022 Filing 6 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Transfer Action to District of Connecticut by Plaintiff Brad A. Davis. (Braun, Joseph)
February 1, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Thriving Brands LLC on 1/27/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (Braun, Joseph)
February 1, 2022 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Henkel Corporation on 1/27/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (Braun, Joseph)
January 6, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Stuart Wayne for Plaintiff Brad A. Davis (Wayne, Richard)
December 17, 2021 If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kl)
December 16, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Stuart Wayne for Plaintiff Brad A. Davis (Wayne, Richard)
December 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Henkel Corporation, Thriving Brands LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8641707), filed by Brad A Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Braun, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Henkel Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRAD A DAVIS
Represented By: Richard Stuart Wayne
Represented By: Joseph J. Braun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brad A. Davis
Represented By: Joseph J. Braun
Represented By: Richard Stuart Wayne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HENKEL CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THRIVING BRANDS LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?