Blake v. The Procter & Gamble Company
| Beth Blake |
| The Procter & Gamble Company |
| 1:2021cv00794 |
| December 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTATION ORDER granting #7 Parties' Joint MOTION to Stay all Proceedings Pending JPML Determination. Parties to file a joint status report within 14 days of the JPMLs ruling. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 1/6/22. (sct)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay All Proceedings Pending JPML Determination by Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Liu, Henry) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company of Courtesy Copy of Notice of Related Actions Filed with Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Actions, #2 Certificate of Service) (Liu, Henry) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company of Courtesy Copy of Motion to Transfer Filed with Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer, #2 Schedule of Actions, #3 Certificate of Service) (Liu, Henry) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company. (Liu, Henry) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Henry Ben-Heng Liu for Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company (Liu, Henry) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kl) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to The Procter & Gamble Company on 12/23/2021, answer due 2/22/2022. (Wolterman, Steven) |
| Filing 1 Class Action COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against The Procter & Gamble Company ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8649143), filed by Beth Blake. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Wolterman, Steven) Modified name of Defendant on 12/23/2021 (er). Modified docket text on 12/30/2021 (kl). Attorney reported to Clerk's Office 12/30/2021 that he no longer is in need of a summons issued. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blake v. The Procter & Gamble Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Beth Blake | |
| Represented By: | Steven Richard Wolterman |
| Represented By: | Matthew C. Metzger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Company | |
| Represented By: | Henry Ben-Heng Liu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
