Johnson v. Cool et al
Plaintiff: Willie Johnson
Defendant: William Cool, Denney, Goodman, Doctor Conley, John Doe(s) 1 and 2 and John Doe(s) 3-6
Case Number: 1:2022cv00031
Filed: January 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Caroline H Gentry
Referring Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
2 Judge: Matthew W McFarland
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that the February 22, 2022 Opinion and Order (Doc. #7 ) is VACATED to the extent that it ordered service by the United States Marshal. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve a summons and copy of the complaint on Defendants William Cool, Denny, Goodman, Doctor Conley, and on Jon Does 1-6, if and when Plaintiff discovers the identity of the unnamed Defendants through discovery. Failure to comply with the terms of this Order shall result in a Report and Recommendation to the District Court that Plaintiffs claims against Defendants be dismissed for lack of service. Any questions regarding service should be directed to the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 3/2/2022. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ***VACATED per #8 *** OPINION AND ORDER - It was further recommended that Plaintiff be ordered to pay the full filing fee within thirty days of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. #3 ). Plaintiff has since paid the filing fee. (Doc. #6 ). In light of Plaintiffs payment of the full filing fee in this action, the January 21, 2022 Report and Recommendation (Doc. [3)] is VACATED and Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1 ) is DENIED as moot.It is therefore ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this Order upon Defendants William Cool, Denny, Goodman, and Doctor Conley as directed by Plaintiff. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Before service may be issued upon any remaining John Doe Defendants, Plaintiff must file a motion to issue service setting forth the identities of the unidentified Defendants. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to file a motion to issue service, including United States Marshal and summons forms, if and when Plaintiff discovers the identity of the unnamed Defendants through discovery. Plaintiff is advised that no service will be issued on the unnamed Defendants unless Plaintiff complies with this Order. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendants or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon Defendants attorney(s), a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed with the clerk of court a certificate stating the date a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to Defendants or counsel. Any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed with the clerk or which fails to include a certificate of service will be disregarded by the Court. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall inform the Court promptly of any changes in his address which may occur during the pendency of this lawsuit. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 2/22/2022. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified on 3/2/2022 to vacate order (srb).
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 100CIN043705 (bjc)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/8/22. (jcw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/1/22. (jcw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/21/2022. It is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1 ) be DENIED and that plaintiff be ordered to pay the required filing fee of $402.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of filing of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 2/4/2022. (kl)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Willie Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support) (er)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Willie Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Complaint - Exhibits, #3 Civil Cover Sheet (Multiple), #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form, #6 USM form) (er)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Cool et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Cool
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Denney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctor Conley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe(s) 1 and 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe(s) 3-6
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?