Kitchener et al v. Optometric Extension Program Foundation, Inc
| Gregory Kitchener, O.D., Robin Lewis, O.D., Glen Steele, O.D. and Paul Harris, O.D. |
| Optometric Extension Program Foundation, Inc |
| 1:2022cv00060 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or Transfer filed by Defendant Optometric Extension Program Foundation, Inc. (Croushore, Paul) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or Transfer Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss or Transfer filed by Plaintiffs Paul Harris, OD, Gregory Kitchener, OD, Robin Lewis, OD, Glen Steele, OD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Map, #2 Exhibit B - Kitchener Declaration) (Foxx, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #6 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Gregory Kitchener, O.D., Robin Lewis, O.D., Glen Steele, O.D., Paul Harris, O.D., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #6 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Gregory Kitchener, O.D., Robin Lewis, O.D., Glen Steele, O.D., Paul Harris, O.D. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 3/7/2022. (kl) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or Transfer Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss or Transfer filed by Plaintiffs Paul Harris, OD, Gregory Kitchener, OD, Robin Lewis, OD, Glen Steele, OD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Map, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Kitchener) (Foxx, Alexander) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or Transfer by Defendant Optometric Extension Program Foundation, Inc. (Croushore, Paul). Added MOTION to Change Venue on 3/21/2022 (kh). |
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 02/02/2022. (kaf)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul G Croushore for Defendant Optometric Extension Program Foundation, Inc (Croushore, Paul) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Optometric Extension Program Foundation, Inc., originally filed 12/29/2021 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. A2104440, by Gregory Kitchener, OD, Paul Harris, OD, Glen Steele, OD and Robin Lewis, OD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (kl) Replaced attachments to correct text recognition on 2/1/2022 (kl). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Ohio, case number A2104440 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8702267), filed by Optometric Extension Program Foundation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court Documents, #4 Exhibit California Statements of Information, #5 Exhibit Notice to Hamilton County Clerk of Courts, Ohio) (Croushore, Paul) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
