McAfee v. Experian Information Solutions
| Branden McAfee |
| Experian Information Solutions |
| 1:2022cv00110 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Susan J Dlott |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement (Joint) by Defendant Experian Information Solutions (Rector, Emily) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions c/o CT Corporation System. Experian Information Solutions served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 USPS Tracking) (kh) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Strike the Affirmative Defenses in Experian Information Solutions Inc. #6 Answer by Plaintiff Branden McAfee. (kh) |
| Filing 7 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE NOTICE: Rule 26(f) Meeting Report due by 4/25/2022. The Court will thereafter, pursuant to Rule 16(b), enter a Calendar Order or will set and hold a Scheduling Conference after which a Calendar Order will be issued. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions. (Rector, Emily) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Experian plc, Central Source LLC, Online Data Exchange LLC, New Management Services LLC, VantageScore Solutions LLC, Opt-Out Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions.. (Rector, Emily) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Mae Rector for Defendant Experian Information Solutions (Rector, Emily) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Mailing: Certified mailing of summons and complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (bjc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions. (bjc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Experian Information Solutions, filed by Branden McAfee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt) (kh) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 100CIN043785 (kh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McAfee v. Experian Information Solutions | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Branden McAfee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions | |
| Represented By: | Emily Mae Rector |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
