Rutherford et al v. Davol Inc et al
| Carrie Rutherford and Harry Rutherford |
| Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00158 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Short Form ANSWER to #4 Amended Complaint filed by CR Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. (Kloss, William) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Harry Rutherford, Carrie Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rheingold, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Plaintiffs Carrie Rutherford, Harry Rutherford Civil Cover Sheet (Rheingold, David) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint filed by Carrie Rutherford., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint filed by Carrie Rutherford. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 4/4/2022. (daf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Carrie Rutherford. (Rheingold, David) |
| Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AOHSDC-8793900 (daf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
