Bradley v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Loree Marie Bradley |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2022cv00184 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Susan J Dlott |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #10 Certified Administrative Record filed by Commissioner of Social Security, and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #10 Certified Administrative Record as text searchable documents within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 6/6/2022. (eh) |
| Filing 10 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 7/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript Index, #2 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Non Disability Related Development, #6 Disability Related Development, #7 Medical Records Part 1, #8 Medical Records Part 2) (Stark, John) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT (to include both pages) against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Loree Marie Bradley. (Hall, Julie) |
Filing 8
TRANSFER ORDER: Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/23/22. (sem)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kiywhanna LaChic Kellup for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Kellup, Kiywhanna) |
| Judge Susan J. Dlott and Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura added. (jmb) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, there is no unanimous consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to randomly assign this case to a resident District Judge. (jmb) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Loree Marie Bradley. (daf) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within sixty (60) days after filing of the Social Security Identification Form, which copy shall function as the Answer. Plaintiff's Statement of Errors due forty-five (45) days thereafter. Commissioner's response due forty-five (45) days thereafter. Plaintiff may reply fifteen (15) days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 4/6/2022. (daf)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 6/5/2022. (daf) |
| Filing 3 Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 5/5/2022 (kl) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, Pursuant to S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (kl) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Loree Marie Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Soc Sec Identification Form) (Hall, Julie) Modified party name on 4/5/2022 (kl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bradley v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Loree Marie Bradley | |
| Represented By: | Julie A Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Represented By: | Kiywhanna LaChic Kellup |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
