Eckstein v. Brame et al
Plaintiff: Dale Eckstein
Defendant: Thomas L. Brame, Sr. and Shirley Williams Brame
Case Number: 1:2022cv00219
Filed: April 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
Referring Judge: Matthew W McFarland
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2022 Filing 6 Affirm [Aff]idavit Application Acceptance of oaths Of all Custodians and Indemnification by Defendant Thomas L. Brame, Sr. (kl)
May 23, 2022 Filing 5 Affirm [Affidavit Application Writ of Error conflict of Variance of Law (C.F. Remand by To State Court) Filed on May 9, 2022 by Fiduciary/Custodian Magistrate Stephanie K. Bowman For United States District Court and Not by The District Court of The United States Which Is an Article Iii Court, Notice of Non consent And Rebuke and Rejection and Return of Report And Recommendation by Custodian Magistrate/Custodian Stephanie K Bowman Did Not and Does Not Apply, Appointment as Fiduciary Custodian(S), Proof of Claim [And] Trial By jury Is Demanded Therefore Report and Recommendations Filed May 9,2022 Must Be Stricken From Record Because It Is Without Consent by Defendant Thomas L. Brame, Sr. (kl)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED that this matter be REMANDED to the Hamilton County, Ohio Municipal Court. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court should certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny Defendants leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/9/2022. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 25, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed April 8, 2022 in Hamilton County Municipal Court, Case No. 22CV06560 against Shirley Williams Brame, Thomas L. Brame, Sr., filed by Dale Eckstein. (kl)
April 25, 2022 Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 100CIN044174. (kh)
April 25, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Municipal Court, Case No. 22CV06560, filed by Thomas L. Brame, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Filing Fee Receipt) (kh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eckstein v. Brame et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dale Eckstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas L. Brame, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shirley Williams Brame
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?