Behymer et al v. Arbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare, Inc. et al
| Missy Behymer and Paul Kornmiller |
| Arbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare, Inc., Aspen Therapy, LLC, Arbor Home Health Therapy, LLC, Arbor Home Health, LLC, Rob Vadas and Cathy Stitts |
| 1:2022cv00243 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to All Defendants, all Defendants answer due 08/01/2022. (Imm, Stephen) Modified Docket Text to Include answer date on 6/21/2022 (bjc). |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiffs Missy Behymer, Paul Kornmiller re #1 Complaint (Imm, Stephen) Modified docket text on 5/5/2022 (eh). |
| Filing 2 Text Searchable Exhibits re #1 Complaint by Plaintiffs Missy Behymer, Paul Kornmiller. (Imm, Stephen) Modified docket text on 5/5/2022 (eh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8850385), filed by Paul Kornmiller, Missy Behymer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Opt-In Forms) (Imm, Stephen) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
