McKeon v. Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy et al
Gerald Douglas McKeon |
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy and John and/or Jane Doe No. 1 |
1:2022cv00335 |
June 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Matthew W McFarland |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTATION ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #10 ). For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendants' Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #4 ) by August 5, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 07/22/2022. (kaf) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support New date requested 8/5/2022. by Plaintiff Gerald Douglas McKeon. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Feagan, Glenn) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendant Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy. (Leckrone, Joshua) |
NOTATION ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #7 ). For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a response in opposition to Defendants' Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #4 ) by July 22, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 07/11/2022. (kaf) |
Deadline reset per 07/11/2022 Notation Order: Plaintiff's response in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #4 ) due by July 22, 2022. (kaf) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 7/22/2022. by Plaintiff Gerald Douglas McKeon. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Feagan, Glenn) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #3 Complaint, filed by Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Case A2201636 on06/09/2022. (bjc) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy, Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy identifying Corporate Parent Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy for Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy.. (Leckrone, Joshua) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua J. Leckrone for Defendant Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Answer) (Leckrone, Joshua) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support by Defendant Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Janssen Pharmaceuticals. (Taber, Edward) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Day's Miami Heights Pharmacy, Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Janssen Pharmaceuticals and John and/or Jane Doe No. 1 originally filed 5/6/2022 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. A 2201636 by Gerald Douglas McKeon. (kl) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Taber, Edward) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Common Pleas Court, case number A2201636 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8905686), filed by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Taber, Edward) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.