Thomas et al v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Bartley Thomas and Gayle Thomas
Defendant: John Doe and Auto Owners Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2022cv00482
Filed: August 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Matthew W McFarland
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE by Defendant Auto Owners Insurance Company Joint Discovery Plan (Bush, Kevin)
September 20, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Bartley Thomas, Gayle Thomas. (Franke, Gary)
September 16, 2022 Filing 4 Defendant Auto Owners ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Defendant Auto Owners, First COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by Auto Owners Insurance Company. (Bush, Kevin)
August 19, 2022 Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Bartley Thomas, Gayle Thomas. . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Insurance Policy) (Franke, Gary)
August 19, 2022 Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint, filed by Bartley Thomas, Gayle Thomas., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint, filed by Bartley Thomas, Gayle Thomas. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 8/22/2022. (bjc)
August 19, 2022 If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc)
August 18, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Auto Owners Insurance Company, John Doe ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9011299), filed by Bartley Thomas, Gayle Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Insurance Policy) (Franke, Gary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas et al v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bartley Thomas
Represented By: Gary Francis Franke
Represented By: Michael Dillon O'Neill
Represented By: William Morris Bristol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gayle Thomas
Represented By: Gary Francis Franke
Represented By: Michael Dillon O'Neill
Represented By: William Morris Bristol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auto Owners Insurance Company
Represented By: Lorree Lawson Dendis
Represented By: Kevin Roy Bush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?