Wilds v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Petitioner: Johnny Wilds
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Case Number: 1:2022cv00508
Filed: August 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Douglas R Cole
Referring Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by William H Lamb for Respondent Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute (Lamb, William)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying as moot #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/04/2022. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 3, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Johnny Wilds. (bjc)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER- It is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of this Order. Specifically, said answer shall respond to each allegation made in the Petition, raise any affirmative defense relied on by Respondent, and state whether, from Respondent's perspective, any claim in the Petition is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, non-retroactivity, or a statute of limitations. Before filing the answer, the Respondent shall file those portions of the state court record needed to adjudicate this case. When the record is filed electronically, the Courts CM/ECF filing system will affix a unique PageID number to each page of the record, displayed in the upper right-hand corner of the page. All papers filed in the case thereafter by either party shall include record references to the PageID number. Prior to filing the state court record, the Warden's counsel shall ensure that any borders on parts of the record (typically, court reporter transcripts) do not obscure the PageID number when the page is filed. The record shall be indexed by insertion of "bookmarks" in the.pdf version of the state court record uploaded to the Courts CM/ECF system, which display each exhibit and the name of that exhibit in the record. As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, a complete copy of the answer and state court record with the PageID numbers must be served on Petitioner at the time of filing. Petitioner may, not later than twenty-one (21) days after the answer is filed, file and serve a reply to the answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/29/2022. (kl)(This document has been sent by regular mail to Johnny Wilds. This document and Doc. #1 Petition have also been sent to the Attorney General of Ohio, Habeas Corpus Unit of the Corrections Litigation Section c/o Brian.Higgins@OhioAGO.gov and Habeas.docketclerk@OhioAGO.gov. )
September 28, 2022 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 100000483. (kh)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER - Petitioner is ORDERED to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner is advised that failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this action for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/6/2022. (kl)(This document and an Application and Affidavit By Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form have been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF TRANSFER signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/1/2022.The Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division in Cincinnati, for all further proceedings. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 1, 2022 Case transferred in from Eastern Division at Columbus on 09/01/2022. Case Number 2:22-cv-3274. Case assigned to Judge Douglas R. Cole. (eh)
August 30, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Johnny Wilds. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment to Petition, #2 Envelope) (tla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/31/2022: #3 Appendix, #4 Appendix Attachment) (ds). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/31/2022: #4 Appendix Attachment) (ds).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilds v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Johnny Wilds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Represented By: William H Lamb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?