Webb et al v. The Azek Company, LLC
| Nelson Webb and Christina Webb |
| The Azek Company, LLC doing business as Azek Timber Tech |
| 1:2022cv00566 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by The Azek Company, LLC. (Kasson, D)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against The Azek Company, LLC, filed by Nelson Webb, Christina Webb in the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas, Case CVC20220285 on 08/15/2022. (bjc)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio of Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorney Jonathan E. Davidson and Matthew D. Davidson (bjc)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (PAID - 1st Receipt Number - AOHSDC-9069122) from Clinton County Common Pleas, case number CVC20220285 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9069153), filed by The Azek Company, LLC dba Azek Timber Tech. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Supp Cover Sheet) (Kasson, D) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2022: #4 State Court Complaint) (bjc).
|
|
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
