Menkaus et al v. City of Milford, Ohio et al
Tara Menkaus, Linda Cassidy and Cassidy Enterprises, LLC |
City of Milford, Ohio and Christine Celsor |
1:2022cv00568 |
September 30, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Barrett |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 20 REPLY to Response to Motion re #18 MOTION Motion to Consolidate Preliminary Injunction with Trial on Merits and Deny Defendants' Uncaptioned Motion to Strike re #8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Corrected, #16 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus. (Thompson, Maurice) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re #18 MOTION Motion to Consolidate Preliminary Injunction with Trial on Merits and Deny Defendants' Uncaptioned Motion to Strike re #8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Corrected, #16 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Defendants Christine Celsor, City of Milford, Ohio. (Pacheco, Bryan) |
Filing 18 MOTION Motion to Consolidate Preliminary Injunction with Trial on Merits and Deny Defendants' Uncaptioned Motion to Strike re #8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Corrected, #16 Reply to Response to Motion by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus. (Thompson, Maurice) |
![]() |
Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint [Oral Argument Requested] filed by Defendant City of Milford, Ohio. (Pacheco, Bryan) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Sever and dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus (Thompson, Maurice) Modified on 12/5/2022 to covert pursuant to #17 Order (kkz). |
Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint [Oral Argument Requested] filed by Defendants Christine Celsor, City of Milford, Ohio. (Pacheco, Bryan) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint [Oral Argument Requested] filed by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus. (Thompson, Maurice) |
*PLEASE DISREGARD THIS NOTICE OF CORRECTION.* Notice of Correction re [FORMER DOC 12] Reply to Response to Motion: Document filed in error and will be refiled using correct ECF event. (kh) Modified docket text on 11/8/2022 (eh). |
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Corrected filed by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus. (Thompson, Maurice) Modified docket text and links to motion on 11/8/2022. (eh) Modified on 11/8/2022 (eh). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint [Oral Argument Requested] by Defendants Christine Celsor, City of Milford, Ohio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Text of Proposed Order) (Pacheco, Bryan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan E Pacheco for Defendants Christine Celsor, City of Milford, Ohio (Pacheco, Bryan) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly E. Pitcher for Defendants Christine Celsor, City of Milford, Ohio (Pitcher, Kelly) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Corrected by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus. (Thompson, Maurice) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus re #2 Notice of Non-Compliance of Local Rule 5.1(c) (Clerk's Notice),, #1 Complaint, #6 Order, Re-Filing Exhibits in Text-Searchable Format (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Re-Filed Text Searchable Exhibit 2- Doc. 1-2, #2 Exhibit Re-Filed Text Searchable Exhibit 3 - Doc. 1-3, #3 Exhibit Re-Filed Text Searchable Exhibit 5 - Doc. 1-5) (Thompson, Maurice) |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus. (Thompson, Maurice). Added MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on 10/3/2022 (kl). |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus re #2 Notice of Non-Compliance of Local Rule 5.1(c) (Clerk's Notice),, #1 Complaint, #3 Notice (Other) (Thompson, Maurice) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Plaintiffs Linda Cassidy, Cassidy Enterprises, LLC, Tara Menkaus re #2 Notice of Non-Compliance of Local Rule 5.1(c) (Clerk's Notice),, #1 Complaint, Amended Civil Cover Sheet (Thompson, Maurice) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint, filed by Tara Menkaus, Linda Cassidy., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint, filed by Tara Menkaus, Linda Cassidy. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 10/3/2022. (bjc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9070157), filed by Tara Menkaus, Linda Cassidy. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Tara Menkhaus, #2 Exhibit City of Milford STR Ordinance, #3 Exhibit Letter Denying Permit to Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit Correspondence between Plaintiff and Defendant, #5 Exhibit Neighboring Permit, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Thompson, Maurice) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.