McGlone v. D.R.C. Warren Correctional Institution et al
| Jerry Lawrence McGlone, II |
| D.R.C. Warren Correctional Institution, C.O. Shaski, C.O. Pennzki, Sgt. Maggard, Unit Manager Williams, Deputy Warden, Warden, Warren Correctional Institution, Investor Chamberland, Inspector (W.C.I.), Medical Staffs, C.O. Farmer, Luriki, R.I.B. Chairman and Lt. Lane |
| 1:2022cv00573 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 OBJECTION to #2 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Jerry Lawrence McGlone, II. (jlk) |
Filing 2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that Plaintiff be ordered to pay the full $402.00 filing fee required to commence this action w/in thirty (30) days. Objections to R&R due by 10/19/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 10/5/2022. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jerry Lawrence McGlone, II. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form, #4 USM 285 Form, #5 Envelope) (kl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
