Pio v. Howell Contractors, Inc.
| Joseph Pio |
| Howell Contractors, Inc. and John Doe |
| 1:2022cv00616 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Defendant Howell Contractors, Inc. (Duffy, Matthew) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Howell Contractors, Inc.. Originally Filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio (Case No. A2203405). (tla) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joseph Pio. Originally Filed on 09/19/2022 in the Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio (Case No. A2203405). (Attachments: #1 Exhibits Part 1, #2 Exhibits Part 2) (tla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Defendant Howell Contractors, Inc. Civil Cover Sheet and Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet (Duffy, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio, case number A 2203405 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9107057), filed by Howell Contractors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer to Complaint) (Duffy, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
