Sealy v. Barrett et al
Plaintiff: Dessalines Sealy
Defendant: Michael Barrett, Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo and Richard W. Nagel
Case Number: 1:2022cv00651
Filed: November 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
Referring Judge: Jeffery P Hopkins
2 Judge: Matthew W McFarland
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #4 Complaint filed by Dessalines Sealy. IT IS RECOMMENDED this action be DISMISSED with PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim for relief. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/5/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 12/22/2022. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 22, 2022 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Michael Barrett, Richard W. Nagel, Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo, filed by Dessalines Sealy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (km)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 12/22/2022. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins for all further proceedings. Judge Matthew W. McFarland no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 12/21/22. (jcw)
November 10, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dessalines Sealy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Exhibits, #4 Summons Forms, #5 USM-285 Forms, #6 Envelopes) (kh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sealy v. Barrett et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dessalines Sealy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard W. Nagel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?