Scottsdale Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Countrytyme Land, LLC et al
Scottsdale Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
Countrytyme Land, LLC, Mark M Graham and Rick Hughes |
1:2022cv00685 |
November 21, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Douglas R Cole |
Jeffery P Hopkins |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Defendants ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint , First COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by All Defendants. (Bendig, Charles) |
![]() |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Countrytyme Land, LLC on 12/5/2022, answer due 2/3/2023; Mark M Graham on 12/5/2022, answer due 2/3/2023; Rick Hughes on 12/5/2022, answer due 2/3/2023. (Hamilton, Michael) |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Countrytyme Land, LLC, Mark M Graham, Rick Hughes, filed by Scottsdale Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Hamilton, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT COMPLAINT against Countrytyme Land, LLC, Mark M Graham, Rick Hughes ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9149882), filed by Scottsdale Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Hamilton, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.