Prows v. City of Oxford et al
| Tate Prows and Tate David Prows |
| City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith, Doug Elliott, William Snavely, Chantel Raghu, Jason Bracken, Glenn Ellerbe, David Prytherch and Edna Southard |
| 1:2022cv00693 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MOTION to Strike #13 Answer to Amended Complaint, by Plaintiff Tate David Prows. (Prows, Tate)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Scheduling/Status Conference : Please take notice that the above-captioned case has been set for a Status/Scheduling Conference before the Honorable Karen L. Litkovitz on: Friday, February 3, 2023 at 2:30 pmParties are to call into the conference line five minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the conference. Conference meeting telephone number: 1-877-336-1839 Access code: 9003349 Participant security code: 1000 (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 17
RULE 26(f) REPORT of the Parties by Defendant City of Oxford. (Lynch, Jane)
|
|
Filing 16
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Edna Southard. Edna Southard served on 1/3/2023, answer due 1/24/2023. (md)
|
|
Filing 15
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants City of Oxford, Glenn Ellerbe, Doug Elliott, John A. Jones, David Prytherch, Michael Smith, William Snavely. City of Oxford served on 12/30/2022, answer due 1/20/2023; Glenn Ellerbe served on 12/30/2022, answer due 1/20/2023; Doug Elliott served on 12/30/2022, answer due 1/20/2023; John A. Jones served on 12/30/2022, answer due 1/20/2023; David Prytherch served on 12/30/2022, answer due 1/20/2023; Michael Smith served on 1/6/2023, answer due 1/27/2023; William Snavely served on 12/30/2022, answer due 1/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 USPS Tracking) (kh)
|
|
Filing 14
Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order - Pursuant to Rule 26(f) Fed. R. Civ. P., all counsel and any pro se parties to this action must agree on a date for a discovery conference. As the result of such conference, the parties must file the required Joint Report of the Parties not later than fourteen (14) days after the discovery conference is conducted. Unless otherwise agreed in the discovery plan, the parties shall make the disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) at or within fourteen days after the discovery conference. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures are NOT to be filed with the Court. It is only necessary to file a Rule 26(f) Joint Report of the Parties within the required time. The parties must comply with the above mandates of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and file the Rule 26(f) Report of the Parties by February 13, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 01/11/2023. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 13
Defendants City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith, Doug Elliott, William Snavely, Chantel Raghu, Jason Bracken, Glenn Ellerbe, David Prytherch and Edna Southard's ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand Endorsed Hereon filed by All Defendants. (Lynch, Jane)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTATION ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/22/2023.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 01/03/2023. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 11
Certificate of Mailing: Certified mailing of Summons and Complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (md)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to City of Oxford c/o Christopher Conard. (md)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #4 MOTION by pro se Litigant to obtain electronic case filing rights. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/27/2022. (md)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Rule 26(f) Conference Extension of Time by Plaintiff Tate Prows. (bjc). Modified to replace the document filed with the correct document on 12/28/2022 (bjc).
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jason Bracken, City of Oxford, Glenn Ellerbe, Doug Elliott, John A. Jones, David Prytherch, Chantel Raghu, Michael Smith, William Snavely, Edna Southard, filed by Tate Prows. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (bjc)
|
|
Filing 6
Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order - Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/23/2023.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/22/2022. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by All Defendants. (Lynch, Jane)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by pro se Litigant to obtain electronic case filing rights by Plaintiff Tate Prows. (md)
|
|
Filing 3
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 100000776. (kh)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Jason Bracken, City of Oxford, Glenn Ellerbe, Doug Elliott, John A. Jones, David Prytherch, Chantel Raghu, Michael Smith, William Snavely, Edna Southard. (kh)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Jason Bracken, City of Oxford, Glenn Ellerbe, Doug Elliott, John A. Jones, David Prytherch, Chantel Raghu, Michael Smith, William Snavely, Edna Southard, filed by Tate Prows. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits, #3 Filing Fee Receipt) (kh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
