Barrett-Peters v. Wal-Mart Inc.
| Tanya Barrett-Peters |
| Wal-Mart Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00712 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CALENDAR ORDER: Please be aware that a Status Conference is set for 2/9/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael R. Barrett; Motions to Amend due by 2/27/2023; Motions directed to pleadings due by 2/27/2023; Plaintiff Primary Expert due by 6/2/2023; Defendant Primary Expert due by 7/12/2023; Disclosure of Non-Expert (Fact) Witness due by 3/31/2023; Rebuttal Expert due by 8/25/2023; Discovery due by 9/28/2023; Dispositive motions due by 10/31/2023; Settlement Conference set for 12/14/2023 at 1:00 PM in Chambers before Judge Michael R. Barrett; Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/29/2024 at 11:00 AM in Chambers before Judge Michael R. Barrett; Jury Trial set for 5/2024 before Judge Michael R. Barrett. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 1/25/2023. (kkz) (kkz). Document Modified on 1/25/2023 to correct Settlement Conference and FPTC dates (kkz).
|
| Filing 5 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant Wal-Mart Inc.. (Caligaris, Michael) |
| NOTICE of Deadline: Rule 26(f) Report due by 1/5/2023. Please visit www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/FPbarrett to obtain copies of the Court's required Rule 26(f) report and joint final pretrial order forms as well as its trial procedures. (kkz) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER with Jury Demand to #3 Complaint originally filed 12/1/2022 in Clermont County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. 2022 CVC 01072) by Wal-Mart Inc. (eh) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed 11/4/2022 in Clermont County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. 2022 CVC 01072) by Tanya Barrett-Peters against Wal-Mart Inc. (eh) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (eh) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Wal-Mart Inc.. (Caligaris, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, case number 22CVC01072 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9164973), filed by Wal-Mart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Answer, #3 Exhibit State Court Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Caligaris, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrett-Peters v. Wal-Mart Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tanya Barrett-Peters | |
| Represented By: | Andrew James Trice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Joseph Caligaris |
| Represented By: | Robert W Hojnoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
