Chamberlin et al v. Technology Credit Union et al
| Thomas Chamberlin and Amanda Chamberlin |
| Technology Credit Union, Sunlight Financial, LLC, Jayson Waller and Trivest Partners, L.P. |
| 1:2022cv00722 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER for Intra-District Transfer to the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/7/2022. (kkz)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Thomas and Amanda Chamberlin against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9170360), filed by Amanda Chamberlin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Signed Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A (Sales Agreement), #3 Exhibit B (Loan Agreement), #4 Summons Form Proposed Summons) (Burton, Andrew) |
| Intra District Transfer - Case transferred to Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus as case number 2:22-cv-4318. This case has been closed and all future filings should be made in case number 2:22-cv-4318. (kkz) . |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
