Williams v. Taylor et al
| Qian Williams |
| Dale Taylor and Kenneth Baker |
| 1:2023cv00002 |
| January 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Caroline H Gentry |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that case numbers 1:23-cv-002 and 1:22-cv-769 ARE related and that the subject case should be transferred to the docket of Judge Douglas R. Cole. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole and Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 3/2/2023. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER - re #1 Complaint filed by Qian Williams (Deficiency Deadline by 2/24/2023.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 1/25/2023. (srb)(This document and a blank copy of the standard "Application and Affidavit by Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees" has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 1
Declaratory Judgment COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Kenneth Baker, Dale Taylor, filed by Qian Williams (scanned as received). (kh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
