Stansberry v. Police Department (Springdale OH)
Brett Stansberry |
Police Department (Springdale OH) |
1:2023cv00006 |
January 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Barrett |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Jeffery P Hopkins |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that case numbers 1:23-cv-100; 1:23-cv-038; 1:22-cv-667; 1:22-cv-543; 1:23-cv-006 ARE RELATED and that the subject case should be transferred to the docket of Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland and Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins on 2/28/2023. (md)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 7 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 1:23-cv-38, 1:22-cv-667, and 1:22-cv-543 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 02/21/2023. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing SD Card by Plaintiff Brett Stansberry (eh) |
SD Card re doc. #6 forwarded this date to the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (eh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing SD Card by Plaintiff Brett Stansberry (eh) |
Filing 3 Objection to #2 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Brett Stansberry. (eh) Modified on 1/30/2023 to retitle filing to an Objection to R&R (kkz). |
Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED; (2) If this recommendation is adopted, that Plaintiff be GRANTED an EXTENSION OF TIME of 30 days from the date of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation to pay the required filing fee of $402.00. Plaintiff should be notified that his complaint will not be deemed "filed" until the appropriate filing fee is paid, and that if he fails to pay the filing fee within 30 days this matter will be closed. Objections to R&R due by 1/24/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/10/2023. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brett Stansberry. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons and USM-285 Form) (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stansberry v. Police Department (Springdale OH) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brett Stansberry | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Police Department (Springdale OH) | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.