Stansberry v. Curritos
Plaintiff: Brett Stansberry
Defendant: Curritos
Case Number: 1:2023cv00038
Filed: January 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael R Barrett
Referring Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
2 Judge: Jeffery P Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that case numbers 1:23-cv-100; 1:23-cv-038; 1:22-cv-667; 1:22-cv-543; 1:23-cv-006 ARE RELATED and that the subject case should be transferred to the docket of Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland and Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins on 2/28/2023. (md)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 1:23-cv-6, 1:22-cv-667, and 1:22-cv-543 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 02/21/2023. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 21, 2023 Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Brett Stansberry. (bjc)
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #1 be DENIED; (2) If this recommendation is adopted, Plaintiff should be GRANTED an EXTENSION OF TIME of 30 days from the date of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation to pay the required filing fee of $402.00. Plaintiff should be notified that his complaint will not be deemed "filed" until the appropriate filing fee is paid, and that if he fails to pay the filing fee within 30 days this matter will be closed. Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/9/2023. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 23, 2023 SD Card submitted with filing forwarded to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Stephanie K.Bowman. (eh) Modified on 1/24/2023 (eh).
January 23, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brett Stansberry. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Right to Sue Letter, #4 Service Documents, #5 Notice of Manual FIling) (bjc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/23/2023: #6 Complaint) (bjc). Modified to Replace Incorrect Complaint with Correct One on 1/23/2023 (bjc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stansberry v. Curritos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brett Stansberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curritos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?