Mayhan v. Belzar et al
Brandon L. Mayhan |
Jeffrey Belzar, Sheriff Russell L. Martin, Officer Deskin, Officer Saylor, Officer Burns, Officer Presley (No. 1), Officer Presley (No. 2), Officer Hall (No. 1), Officer Hall (No. 2), Officer Roehrbech, Officer Hanes, Officer Householder, Officer Fogel, Sargent Shoemaker, Sargent Robinson, Sargent Burton, Sargent Frost, Nurse Doe No. 1, Nurse Doe No. 2, Nurse Doe No. 3, Nurse Doe No. 4, Nurse Doe No. 5, Richard Roe, Corrections Officer Deskin, Corrections Officer Saylor, Corrections Officer Burns, Corrections Officer Presley (No. 1), Corrections Officer Presley (No. 2), Corrections Officer Hall (No. 1), Corrections Officer Hall (No. 2), Corrections Officer Roehrbech, Corrections Officer Hanes, Corrections Officer Householder, Corrections Officer Fogel, Corrections Sargent Robinson, Corrections Sargent Burton and Corrections Sargent Frost |
1:2023cv00426 |
July 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Douglas R Cole |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendants Jeffrey Belzar, Burns, Sargent Burton, Deskin, Officer Fogel, Sargent Frost, Officer Hall (No. 1), Officer Hall (No. 2), Officer Hanes, Russell L. Martin, Officer Presley (No. 1), Officer Presley (No. 2), Sargent Robinson, Officer Roehrbech, Saylor, Sargent Shoemaker. (Moser, David) |
Filing 31 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Belzar, Burns, Sargent Burton, Deskin, Nurse Doe No. 1, Nurse Doe No. 2, Nurse Doe No. 3, Nurse Doe No. 4, Nurse Doe No. 5, Officer Fogel, Sargent Frost, Officer Hall (No. 1), Officer Hanes, Russell L. Martin, Officer Presley (No. 1), Sargent Robinson, Richard Roe, Officer Roehrbech, Saylor, Sargent Shoemaker, filed by Brandon L. Mayhan. (Vasvari, Raymond) |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Moser for Defendants Jeffrey Belzar, Burns, Sargent Burton, Deskin, Officer Fogel, Sargent Frost, Officer Hall (No. 1), Officer Hall (No. 2), Officer Hanes, Russell L. Martin, Officer Presley (No. 1), Officer Presley (No. 2), Sargent Robinson, Officer Roehrbech, Saylor, Sargent Shoemaker (Moser, David) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel T Downey for Defendants Jeffrey Belzar, Burns, Sargent Burton, Deskin, Officer Fogel, Sargent Frost, Officer Hall (No. 1), Officer Hall (No. 2), Officer Hanes, Russell L. Martin, Officer Presley (No. 1), Officer Presley (No. 2), Sargent Robinson, Officer Roehrbech, Saylor, Sargent Shoemaker (Downey, Daniel) |
Filing 28 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Jeffrey Belzar, Burns, Sargent Burton, Deskin, Officer Fogel, Sargent Frost, Officer Hall (No. 1), Officer Hall (No. 2), Officer Hanes, Russell L. Martin, Officer Presley (No. 1), Officer Presley (No. 2), Sargent Robinson, Officer Roehrbech, Saylor, Sargent Shoemaker. (Moser, David) |
Filing 27 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Richard Roe. Richard Roe served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 26 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Nurse Doe No. 5. Nurse Doe No. 5 served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 25 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Nurse Doe No. 4. Nurse Doe No. 4 served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 24 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Sargent Burton. Sargent Burton served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 23 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Sargent Shoemaker. Sargent Shoemaker served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 22 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Sargent Robinson. Sargent Robinson served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Sargent Frost. Sargent Frost served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Burns. Burns served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Saylor. Saylor served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Officer Fogel. Officer Fogel served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Officer Hall (No. 1). Officer Hall (No. 1) served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Officer Roehrbech. Officer Roehrbech served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Officer Hanes. Officer Hanes served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Deskin. Deskin served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Jeffrey Belzar. Jeffrey Belzar served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Russell L. Martin. Russell L. Martin served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Officer Presley (No. 1). Officer Presley (No. 1) served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Officer Presley (No. 2). Officer Presley (No. 2) served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Officer Householder. Officer Householder served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Officer Hall (No. 2). Officer Hall (No. 2) served on 7/21/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Nurse Doe No. 1. Nurse Doe No. 1 served on 7/26/2023, answer due 8/16/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Nurse Doe No. 3. Nurse Doe No. 3 served on 7/26/2023, answer due 8/16/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Nurse Doe No. 2. Nurse Doe No. 2 served on 7/26/2023, answer due 8/16/2023. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jeffrey Belzar, Burns, Sargent Burton, Deskin, Nurse Doe No. 1, Nurse Doe No. 2, Nurse Doe No. 3, Nurse Doe No. 4, Nurse Doe No. 5, Officer Fogel, Sargent Frost, Officer Hall (No. 1), Officer Hall (No. 2), Officer Hanes, Officer Householder, Russell L. Martin, Officer Presley (No. 1), Officer Presley (No. 2), Sargent Robinson, Richard Roe, Officer Roehrbech, Saylor, Sargent Shoemaker. (md) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form, #6 Summons Form, #7 Summons Form, #8 Summons Form, #9 Summons Form, #10 Summons Form, #11 Summons Form, #12 Summons Form, #13 Summons Form, #14 Summons Form, #15 Summons Form, #16 Summons Form, #17 Summons Form, #18 Summons Form, #19 Summons Form, #20 Summons Form, #21 Summons Form, #22 Summons Form) (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
Filing 2 Supplemental Memorandum Supporting (Civil Cover Sheet as to Complaint) by Plaintiff Brandon L. Mayhan. (Vasvari, Raymond) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Brandon L. Mayhan ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9502957), filed by Brandon L. Mayhan. (Tsarnas, Nomiki) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.