Boykin et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
| Rah-Nita Boykin, Jennifer Harmon and Elizabeth Rodriguez |
| The Procter & Gamble Company |
| 1:2023cv00427 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Susan J Dlott |
| Jeffery P Hopkins |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTATION ORDER granting #10 Joint Motion to Adopt Schedule for Filing Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleadings. Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint due on or before September 28, 2023. Defendant P&G shall have 35 days, up to and including November 2, 2023, to plead in response to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs shall have 35 days, up to and including December 7, 2023, to file any opposition. Defendant P&G shall have eight (8) days, up to and including December 15, 2023, to file any reply. Signed by Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins on 8/23/2023. (zcc)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Adopt Schedule for Filing Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleadings by Plaintiffs Rah-Nita Boykin, Jennifer Harmon, Elizabeth Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion to Adopt Schedule for Filing Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleadings) (Cox, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company. (Combs, Eric) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extension of Time to Plead by Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company. (Combs, Eric) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: The Procter & Gamble Company answer due 8/28/2023 per #8 Stipulation. (zmc) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company. The Procter & Gamble Company served on 7/17/2023, answer due 8/7/2023. (Lyon, Joseph) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins for all further proceedings. Judge Michael R. Barrett no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 7/18/2023. (kkz)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - The above-captioned matter is hereby TRANSFERRED from the docket of TheHonorable Susan J. DIott to the Clerk of this Court for reassignment. Case reassigned to Judge Michael R. Barrett for all further proceedings. Judge Susan J. Dlott no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 07/17/2023. (bjc)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9507084) of Benjamin F. Johns by Plaintiffs Rah-Nita Boykin, Jennifer Harmon, Elizabeth Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Lyon, Joseph) |
|
NOTATION ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Benjamin F. Johns as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for efiling through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 7/14/2023. (zmc)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Procter & Gamble Company. (kh) |
| Filing 2 Notice by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio of Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorneys Jonathan Shub, Benjamin F. Johns and Samantha E. Holbrook. (kh) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against The Procter & Gamble Company ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9503592), filed by Rah-Nita Boykin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Attachment, #3 Summons Form) (Lyon, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
