Williams v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. et al
Benton Williams, Jr. |
Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC and Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 |
1:2023cv00513 |
August 14, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Barrett |
Karen L Litkovitz |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Benton Williams, Jr. (kh) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 100002530. (kh) |
Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency re: Requires a filing fee or motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Electronic filers can pay the fee #online. Please scroll down to the event called, Pay Fees Via Pay.gov to pay the required fee. Related Document: #1 Complaint filed by Benton Williams, Jr.. Deficiency Deadline by 9/14/2023. (md)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1, filed by Benton Williams, Jr. (scanned as received, no civil cover sheet received) (kh) Modified docket text on 8/15/2023 (md). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.