Powell et al v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
| Curtis Powell, Rebecca A. Powell and C & J Property Enterprises, LLC |
| Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company d/b/a M&T Bank and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company doing business as M&T Bank |
| 1:2023cv00593 |
| September 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTATION ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #6 ). For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint (Doc. #4 ) by December 18, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 10/17/2023. (kaf)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Complaint, New date requested 12/18/2023. by Defendant Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company. (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint) (Brandenburg, Margo) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #3 DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE, ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S #4 COMPLAINT: This matter is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion of Defendant Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, d/b/a M&T Bank for an extension of time to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Curtis Powell, Rebecca A. Powell, and C & J Property Enterprises, LLC. The Court reviewed this Motion and, for good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant is allowed a 30-day extension of time through and including October 19, 2023 to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 09/20/2023. (kaf)
|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed 8/16/2023 in Butler County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. CV 2023 08 1649) by Curtis Powell, Rebecca A. Powell, and C & J Property Enterprises, LLC against Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company. (eh) Modified docket text on 9/20/2023 (eh). |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (eh) |
| Deadline reset per Doc. #5 : Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company's answer due 10/19/2023. (kaf) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 10/19/2023. to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by Defendant Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company d/b/a M&T Bank. (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint) (Brandenburg, Margo) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company d/b/a M&T Bank. (Brandenburg, Margo) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Butler County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas, case number CV 2023 08 1649 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9606469), filed by Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company d/b/a M&T Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Record, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Brandenburg, Margo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
