Prickett et al v. Ms. Medicine, LLC
| Caitlin Prickett, D.O. and Caitlin Prickett, D.O. & Associates, PLLC |
| Ms. Medicine, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00596 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Jeffery P Hopkins |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #9 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by All Plaintiffs. (Dub, Stanley) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - Oral Argument Requested by Defendant Ms. Medicine, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Levi Furr, #2 Exhibit B - Articles of Organization, #3 Exhibit C - Affiliation Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - Clinical Practice Guidelines, #5 Exhibit E - Articles of Organization, #6 Exhibit F - Articles of Amendment to Articles of Organization, #7 Exhibit G - Concierge Medicine of Boca Raton Webpage, #8 Exhibit H - Webpage, #9 Exhibit I - Webpage, #10 Exhibit J - Webpage, #11 Exhibit K - Webpage, #12 Exhibit L - Webpage, #13 Exhibit M - Articles of Organization, #14 Exhibit N - Articles of Organization, #15 Exhibit O - Articles of Organization, #16 Exhibit P - Articles of Organization, #17 Exhibit Q - Articles of Organization) (Andrew, Marcia) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Caitlin Prickett, D.O. & Associates, PLLC, Caitlin Prickett, D.O. filed by Ms. Medicine, LLC. (Andrew, Marcia) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #8 MOTION FOR STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE OR OTHERWISE PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO #1 PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT. Defendant's answer due 11/8/2023. Signed by Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins on 10/23/2023. (emv)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, New date requested 11/8/2023. by Defendant Ms. Medicine, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Despas, Kimberly) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Ms. Medicine, LLC. (Dub, Stanley) |
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #5 Summons Returned Executed filed by Caitlin Prickett, D.O. & Associates, PLLC, Caitlin Prickett, D.O.., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #5 Summons Returned Executed filed by Caitlin Prickett, D.O. & Associates, PLLC, Caitlin Prickett, D.O.. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 10/5/2023. (bjc) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Ms. Medicine, LLC. Ms. Medicine, LLC served on 10/4/2023, answer due 10/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service) (Dub, Stanley) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ms. Medicine, LLC. (zmc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Dub, Stanley) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Plaintiff CAITLIN PRICKETT Civil Cover Sheet (Dub, Stanley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9610197), filed by CAITLIN PRICKETT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Relevant Contract, #2 Exhibit Methods of Operation) (Dub, Stanley) Modified docket text on 9/21/2023 (md). |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
