Cataline v. Beechmont Brewing, LLC
| Heather Cataline |
| Beechmont Brewing, LLC doing business as Wandering Monsters Brewing Company |
| 1:2023cv00621 |
| September 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Jeffery P Hopkins |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Ellis Willits for Defendant Beechmont Brewing, LLC (Willits, Chad) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Beechmont Brewing, LLC on 10/02/2023, answer due 12/01/2023. (Bryant, Daniel) Modified Docket Text to Correct Deadline on 11/2/2023 (bjc). |
| Reset Deadlines: Beechmont Brewing, LLC answer due 12/1/2023 re #3 . (bjc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Plaintiff Heather Cataline Consent to Join Forms (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join Forms) (Bryant, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Beechmont Brewing, LLC d/b/a Wandering Monsters Brewing Company ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9624476), filed by Heather Cataline. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to be Named Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bryant, Daniel) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
