Oswald v. Warren Miller, et al.
Dan Oswald |
Warren Miller, United States Postal Service and Auto Owners Insurance |
1:2023cv00723 |
November 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Barrett |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Counter Claimant Auto Owners Insurance, Defendant Auto Owners Insurance, Cross Claimant Auto Owners Insurance. (Dendis, Lorree) |
Filing 7 Defendant Auto Owners ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand , First CROSSCLAIM against Warren Miller, First COUNTERCLAIM against Warren Miller filed by Auto Owners Insurance. (Bush, Kevin) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (bjc) (bjc). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Warren Miller. (bjc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Defendant Dan Oswald Cover Sheet (Gabelman, Richard) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. United States Postal Service (Gabelman, Richard) |
Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Warren Miller (Gabelman, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT First against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9676946), filed by Dan Oswald. (Gabelman, Richard) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.