Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Roto Rooter Services Company
FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSRANCE COMPANY and Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company |
Roto Rooter Services Company |
1:2023cv00747 |
November 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Jeffery P Hopkins |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Roto Rooter Services Company. (Schisler, Harold) |
Set Deadlines re doc. #4 : Roto Rooter Services Company answer due 12/6/2023. (eh) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Toni Hall, Authorized Agent on 11/15/2023, filed by Plaintiff Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company. (Utke, Mark) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Roto Rooter Services Company. (bjc) |
If this case is referred it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiffs FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSRANCE COMPANY, Frankenmuth Mutual Holding Company identifying Corporate Parent Frankenmuth Mutual Holding Company for FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSRANCE COMPANY.. (Utke, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Roto Rooter Services Company ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9685723), filed by FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSRANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Utke, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.