Talbot-Jones v. Cinfed Federal Credit Union
Christopher Talbot-Jones |
CINFED Federal Credit Union |
1:2023cv00829 |
December 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Douglas R Cole |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED CASES AND TO APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 1/25/24. (sct) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (sct) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Move or Plead. Cinfed Federal Credit Union to move, answer, or otherwise plead by 3/18/24. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 1/12/24. (sct) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 3/18/2024. by Defendant CINFED Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Camardo, Sam) |
Reset Deadlines: CINFED Federal Credit Union answer due 1/17/2024. (zmc) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Extension of Time to Move or Plead by Defendant CINFED Federal Credit Union. (Camardo, Sam) |
Filing 5 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that cases 1:23-cv-829, 1:23-cv-787, and 1:23-cv-776 are related, the subject case nevertheless will remain with the Judge to who it was assigned. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 12/21/2023. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified Docket Text to Correct Case Number on 12/21/2023 (bjc). |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against CINFED Federal Credit Union, filed by Christopher Talbot-Jones in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case A 2305083 on 11/22/2023. (bjc) Modified Docket Text to Add Jury Demand on 12/21/2023 (bjc). |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant CINFED Federal Credit Union. (Camardo, Sam) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A 2305083 ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9739087), filed by CINFED Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Common Pleas Complaint, #3 Exhibit B-Declaration of Eric Ketcham) (Camardo, Sam) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Talbot-Jones v. Cinfed Federal Credit Union | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christopher Talbot-Jones | |
Represented By: | Joseph Michael Lyon |
Represented By: | Kevin Michael Cox |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CINFED Federal Credit Union | |
Represented By: | James A Slater, Jr |
Represented By: | Sam Anthony Camardo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.