Alili v. Experian PLC et al
| Mahmoud Ossama Alili |
| Experian PLC, Equifax INC. and TransUnion LLC. |
| 1:2024cv00010 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTATION ORDER granting #12 Defendant Experian PLC's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time Until 4/4/2024 in Which to Answer, Move or Otherwise Plead Plaintiff's Complaint #1 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 3/4/2024. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 4/4/2024. by Defendant Experian PLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Berens, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint And Affirmative Defenses filed by TransUnion LLC.. (Huse, William) |
| Reset Deadlines: TransUnion LLC. answer due 2/29/2024 per Doc. #9 . (bjc) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants TransUnion LLC., TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., TransUnion, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for TransUnion LLC... (Huse, William) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TRANS UNION, LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Defendant TransUnion LLC.. (Huse, William) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by William Madison Huse for Defendant TransUnion LLC. (Huse, William) |
|
NOTATION ORDER granting #6 Defendant Experian PLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Answer, Move or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/1/2024. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Experian PLC, Experian plc, Central Source LLC, Online Data Exchange LLC, New Management Services LLC, VantageScore Solutions LLC, Opt-Out Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian PLC.. (Berens, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 3/7/2024. by Defendant Experian PLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Berens, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel W. Berens for Defendant Experian PLC (Berens, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants Equifax INC. served on 1/16/2024, answer due 2/6/2024; Experian PLC served on 1/16/2024, answer due 2/6/2024. (eh) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's CERTIFICATE of Mailing re #1 Complaint and #2 Summons Issued. (eh) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Equifax INC., Experian PLC, TransUnion LLC. (eh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Equifax INC., Experian PLC, TransUnion LLC., filed by Mahmoud Ossama Alili. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt) (zmc) |
| Filing fee Received: $ 405.00, receipt number 100003239 (zmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
