Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. Frick Real Estate, Ltd. et al
| Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. and COSTA DEL MAR, INC |
| FRICK REAL ESTATE, LTD, TRADERS WORLD, INC and JAY FRICK |
| 1:2024cv00153 |
| March 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form) (Rodman, Rachael) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff COSTA DEL MAR, INC. (Rodman, Rachael) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiffs Oakley, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International, S.A., EssilorLuxottica, S.A. identifying Corporate Parent EssilorLuxottica, S.A., Other Affiliate Luxottica Group S.p.A., Other Affiliate Essilor International, S.A. for Oakley, Inc... (Rodman, Rachael) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiffs Luxottica Group S.p.A., EssilorLuxottica, S.A. identifying Corporate Parent EssilorLuxottica, S.A. for Luxottica Group S.p.A... (Rodman, Rachael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9877114), filed by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rodman, Rachael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
